Groton Votes “No” on the Repair of the Squannacook Dam
By Sherry Anders At the Groton Town Meeting on May 2nd, an article to appropriate $752,500 to fund the repair of the Squannacook River Dam was placed before voters. The article required a two-thirds majority vote to pass. It failed with 125 votes in the affirmative and 182 in the negative. Included in the article was language that would have allowed special legislation to be filed to pursue a taking of the Shirley half of the dam, which is privately owned but currently in tax title. Those in favor of the repair advocated for the preservation of the mill pond and dam as historic relics of Groton’s mill history, uniquely contributing to the character of West Groton. Concern was also expressed about what would happen to the existing ecology in the pond and oxbow. Environmental advocates echoing the consensus position of regional environmental organizations argued, however, that the ecological benefits of removing the obsolete structure outweighed these concerns. Liability considerations came to the fore when a question regarding insurance was posed to Groton Town Manager Mark Haddad, who replied: “There is no insurance. We cannot get insurance on the dam, so we assume 100% liability.” The dam is classified as “High Hazard,” indicating that failure would likely result in loss of life and serious damage to homes, buildings, or other structures – a heavy risk for a town to shoulder. Bruce Easom, who serves on both the Groton Conservation Commission and the Community Preservation Committee, called attention to another serious problem. The article called for $133,000 of the total funds requested to be appropriated from the Community Preservation Fund Historic Reserve. The requirements of the Office of Dam safety, however, would require changes to the dam that would not adhere to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, putting the funding at risk. With a clear “no” on the repair, what comes next? The Town of Groton has sent a letter expressing a commitment to remove the dam to the State’s Department of Ecological Restoration (DER). This expression of commitment is required for DER’s assistance in seeking the permitting and funding to catalyze removal, a process that is likely to take 2-3 years before the removal can actually begin.